Tesco Direct

YouTube Preview Image

For an industry that is supposedly meant to be ahead of the zeitgeist, advertisers have a distinctly outdated viewpoint of human beings. Women are tawdry bags of imperfections that are in need of medical and cosmetic improvements, while men are serial sleazebags in search of the next commitment free lay. From the battling hoardes of early-morning shoppers who will willingly tear the jugular out of another female in order to get the new Chanel No.9, to the AIDS carrying ‘Mickey’ from the universally detested Head and Shoulders advert, they seem hell-bent on convincing us to be impressed by our most outdated stereotypes.

Take this latest advert from Tesco Direct. It’s clearly meant to be classy and sophisticated, but it comes across as a detestable 30 second remake of Alfie. A charmless date rapist, played by a man who is apparently a famous TV actor, tries to seduce an ex-Eastender by having his house fitted with budget furnishing… and she’s impressed by him.

Not only does it present men as egocentric wannabe lotharios, but it also offers up a viewpoint of women as obtainable when presented with the right combination of material possessions. Big fridge-freezer? Check. Nice new oven? Check. Remotely controlled faux-fireplace – surely the epitome of pseudo middle-class chintz? Check. The only thing they’re missing is the Tesco own brand Rohypnol he slips into her drink when his carefully balanced check list fails to get his dick sucked.

I’m confused as to what Tesco thought they were saying by commissioning this piece of instructional sleaze. Is our main character so desperate to nail this cock-tease of a cliche that he’s prepared to give it a shot while the delivery men are still in the house? “Don’t mind the workmen, love, now about getting your tits out…?” Is she so classy that she finds his ignoring of the proletariat boiler suits around them sexy? “Ooooh, I just love the way you pretend that those dirty little men don’t exist, now crank up the fake fireplace.”

Come to think of it, what woman in this world would be impressed by a guy who’s fitted his entire house with furnishings from Tesco? Ikea may have made mass-produced designer house furniture fashionable, but at least they suggest you mix and match to create your own style… Our deluded Don Juan character has simply let the biggest supermarket chain in the country decide what his furnishings should be. Character, style, a personal touch – all have been jetisoned in favour of an atypical image of middle-class success. They can worry about what looks good in his home while he gets on with the important business of getting his leg over with some dodgy, out-of-work, easily impressed skank.

While this advert is filled with horribly sex-pesty behaviour, my favourite moment is at 21 seconds in when our consumerismly impressed couple have to do a deliberate slow walk in order to let the Tesco men roll out the rug in time. It’s a moot point, for sure, but one that I find terribly funny…

Blog Widget by LinkWithin

Post to Twitter Tweet This!

77 Comments

  • Posted October 12, 2007 at 7:40 am | Permalink

    You just dissed the woman I was in love with (circa 1994).

    A plague on your family.

    I still think Martine’s a scorcher.

  • Posted October 12, 2007 at 7:46 am | Permalink

    Martine may well be a scorcher, but her character in this advert is a dodgy, out-of-work, easily impressed skank. It’s all about the acting… didn’t she used to be on the West End stage? I thought she was being primed as the next Julie Andrews? What happened there?

  • Posted October 12, 2007 at 8:39 am | Permalink

    Balls to you. You’re meant to be a hotshot, big time, household-name Director and I’m meant to be respected novelist – life doesn’t always turn out the way we’d like so there’s no need to sneer at my BELOVED Martine.

    (She’s a bit of a pudding these days, eh?)

  • Posted October 12, 2007 at 8:41 am | Permalink

    Watch the advert again Dave – she ran to fat. As for your question as to what woman would be impressed by a house decked out entirely in stuff from TESCO, well, are you still in Britain? I can think of hundreds and thousands of women who would be impressed by this sort o’ shit. Look around you. See all those cheap Primark Victoria Beckhams wandering around? The ones wearing sunglasses as big as motorcycle visors? Got ‘em? Those women, Dave. Or how’s about watching Trisha? The women on there Dave. Or read back through some previous WWM posts. See the girls writing about how fabulous that boob-mare Jordan is? Those women Dave.

  • Posted October 12, 2007 at 8:44 am | Permalink

    NC – what the fuck does your first sentence mean?

  • Posted October 12, 2007 at 8:49 am | Permalink

    Martine ran to fat SH. To fat! How d’ye like THEM onions?

  • Posted October 12, 2007 at 8:51 am | Permalink

    It was in reply to Dave asking ‘what happened there?’ See above. Dave’s bit. Up there. There!

  • Posted October 12, 2007 at 8:54 am | Permalink

    She’s hardly ‘fat’, you scoundrel.

  • Posted October 12, 2007 at 8:57 am | Permalink

    Napolean… I fear you’re right. It’s just a bit depressing though, isn’t it?

    Maybe we can get readers to swing over from the Tesco fan site and defend in bad english their favourite supermarket catalogue.

    “tesco is the best. any1 who doesnt think that tesco is awesome is a idiot. i love there fireplaces so shut up about stuff you dont no about.”

  • Posted October 12, 2007 at 9:03 am | Permalink

    I didn’t even know they did furniture.
    They should focus on their fruit and veg, it’s all shit.

  • Posted October 12, 2007 at 9:10 am | Permalink

    They keep sending me money off vouchers for TESCO Direct after I made the mistake of doing ONE online shop with ‘em. The buggers.

    She is fat.

  • Posted October 12, 2007 at 9:11 am | Permalink

    In comparison to who?

  • Posted October 12, 2007 at 9:16 am | Permalink

    A thin woman.

  • Posted October 12, 2007 at 9:23 am | Permalink

    So the average-sized or normally-proportioned woman doesn’t exist in your world?

  • Posted October 12, 2007 at 9:24 am | Permalink

    What is this? A Dove advert?

  • Posted October 12, 2007 at 9:29 am | Permalink

    Yes. Here’s your white bikini. PUT IT ON.

    I’m simply saying that your parameters for describing a ladies weight are as follows, from the idiotic flotsam you typed above:

    If a woman is not a thin woman, she is a fat woman.

  • Posted October 12, 2007 at 9:34 am | Permalink

    Idiotic flotsam? So if a woman’s not a thin woman, what does that make her? ‘Average size’ isn’t a medical term bozo. What’s the opposite of thin Dr. S?

  • Posted October 12, 2007 at 9:39 am | Permalink

    ‘Thin’ and ‘fat’ are medical terms? A Doctor might use them, I suppose.

    Thin is one extreme, and fat is another which is measured in terms of obesity.

    Then there are the rest of us, in the middle somewhere. Average folk. I doubt you’ve turned into an adonis since last we met.
    You missed a comma before bozo in your last comment, Mr. Punctuation.

  • Posted October 12, 2007 at 9:44 am | Permalink

    Wasn’t necessary, bozo. And no, you’re correct, thin and fat aren’t medical terms, which is why I never said they were. I’m merely asking you to clarify what you think is the opposite of thin?

  • Posted October 12, 2007 at 9:49 am | Permalink

    Oh – did I say they were medical terms? Answer: no. Weirdo.

    The comma before ‘bozo’ was necessary – I assume you were addressing me? If not you were talking about ‘medical term bozos’ – I’m not sure what they are.

    I just find it funny that people are either fat or thin to you, that there’s no middleground.

  • Posted October 12, 2007 at 9:50 am | Permalink

    I’d argue that thin is thin, and the opposite of fat is skinny… did you take nothing from my first paragraph?

    “Women are tawdry bags of imperfections that are in need of medical and cosmetic improvements”

    Martine isn’t fat, she’s a healthy looking lady. It just happens that she’s an easily impressed, largely unemployable healthy looking lady.

  • Posted October 12, 2007 at 9:58 am | Permalink

    I know they’re not, which is why I never said they were. But you said this, ‘Thin’ and ‘fat’ are medical terms?’ implying that’s what I’d said, which I didn’t. Right back at ya kiddo.

    And it still wasn’t necessary. The mistake I made was not starting ‘bozo’ with a capital letter. That’s my new nickname for you Bozo.

    Anyway, at which point did I say people are either thin or fat and that there’s no middle ground? Where? You’re the one that’s set all the parameters here, not me, old son. If you want to decide what I think for me, that’s fair enough. It still doesn’t change the fact I never said anything of the sort.

  • Posted October 12, 2007 at 10:07 am | Permalink

    Fucking nora…

    You are the first person who said ‘medical term’ so quite what the fuck you’re on about, I’m not sure.

    If you address someone, you put a comma before their name in that instance, Napoleon. Like that. I’m not arsed, but you get so uptight about Piqued’s apostrophes I thought you might like to know how this English business works, Goon.

  • Posted October 12, 2007 at 10:13 am | Permalink

    I’d ignore him SH, he’s been like this all week.

    Actually I’m a little worried he’s running a temperature. Go on love, pop off to bed and I’ll bring you up some juice and a biscuit. Wuv oo

  • Posted October 12, 2007 at 10:19 am | Permalink

    You know what I’m on about. You putting words and into my mouth. This whole thing started with your comment here …

    ‘I’m simply saying that your parameters for describing a ladies weight are as follows, from the idiotic flotsam you typed above:

    If a woman is not a thin woman, she is a fat woman.’

    … and as I’ve mentioned before, I never said anything of the sort. You can hardly expect me to sit back while you decide my thought processes for me, can you?

    As for your comments about my English, I’ll take no bloody lessons from the likes of you, you little whelp. It’s perfectly acceptable to call you ‘Bozo’ in the way I did (obviously, without the capital ‘B’), so stick it up your arse and smoke it.

    Oh, and if we are going to start firing grammar shots across our bows, may I remind you that this …

    ‘I’m simply saying that your parameters for describing a ladies weight …’

    … should be written thus …

    ‘I’m simply saying that your parameters for describing a lady’s weight …’

  • Posted October 12, 2007 at 10:20 am | Permalink

    And you can shove it and all.

  • Posted October 12, 2007 at 10:30 am | Permalink

    Fair point on the apostrophe, GOON.

    And yes, your name, ‘Goon’, is a medical term.

  • Posted October 12, 2007 at 10:33 am | Permalink

    I’m in a very bad mood.

  • Posted October 12, 2007 at 10:34 am | Permalink

    And you’ve changed my name to ‘Goon’ I see. Well done.

  • Posted October 12, 2007 at 10:36 am | Permalink

    Took a lot of work, actually.

    So why are you in a bad mood?

    A PROBLEM AIRED AND SHARED IS A PROBLEM STILL.

  • Posted October 12, 2007 at 10:47 am | Permalink

    Dog’s on his last legs.

  • Posted October 12, 2007 at 10:48 am | Permalink

    Oh shit.
    That puts things into perspective a bit…

  • Posted October 12, 2007 at 10:49 am | Permalink

    Sorry to hear that NC

  • Posted October 12, 2007 at 10:51 am | Permalink

    Not really mate. I’ve been in a bit of a stinker anyway. You shouldn’t be defeated purely by me saying ‘Dog’s on his last legs’. That’s like that guy trying to shoe-horn cancer into a discussion to try trumping everyone else. I’m merely pointing out the reason for my malaise – don’t lower your guard!

  • Posted October 12, 2007 at 10:54 am | Permalink

    Fair enough, you fat goon.

  • Posted October 12, 2007 at 10:57 am | Permalink

    That’s better.

  • Posted October 12, 2007 at 11:06 am | Permalink

    Your dog being sick is a separate issue to your ‘abrasive’ comments (which I regard as tongue in cheek btw)

    What’s up with him? My folks had a dog and from the age of 8 he would regularly give the impression he was about to cash in his chips, as it turned out he finally got his bone when he was 12

    You said ‘malaise’ that’s French that is, Croque Monsieur, Monsieur?

  • Posted October 12, 2007 at 11:42 am | Permalink

    Yes, but ‘malaise’ has been adapted into English in a way that ‘Croque Monsieur’ hasn’t. Because we have the word ’sandwich’ you see? See?

    As for my dog, he’s got anything from acute bronchitis to lung cancer. The vet wants to find out for sure, but we’re both slightly worried that the sedation he’d need for an x-ray would polish him off, so it remains a mystery. The upshot is he spends his days wandering around coughing and spluttering, pissing all over the house, farting, puffing ‘n’ wheezing etc. etc. At the moment he’s on steroids, some other stuff that costs £15 for ten tablets (ten!), and they ain’t working very well. He’s 15, so I wouldn’t be surprised to answer the door to find the Reaper sharpening his scythe.

  • Posted October 12, 2007 at 11:47 am | Permalink

    Hey! That’s an exciting comment!

  • Posted October 12, 2007 at 12:02 pm | Permalink

    15, fucking hell… He sounds like my mum

    If he’s a bad as you describe you might have to risk the x-ray and let fate decide.

    (A CM is no sandwich)

  • Posted October 12, 2007 at 12:05 pm | Permalink

    It is a sandwich. It’s a fancy sandwich. Bread + filling = sandwich.

    Since when did we all get so bloody pithy round ‘ere?

  • Posted October 12, 2007 at 12:11 pm | Permalink

    I’m thinking of taking the x-ray risk, yes.

    I would concur on the sandwich front. I looked up ‘croque monsieur’ on the internet yesterday and it looked a hell of a lot like a sandwich to me.

  • Posted October 12, 2007 at 12:34 pm | Permalink

    It’s actually bread, filling, bread, topping, not a sandwich but I accept your remark on general pithiness / pedantry

    NC, I don’t really think you have much choice to be frank

  • Posted October 12, 2007 at 12:38 pm | Permalink

    I’ve had millions of them, they’re a form of sandwich. So it’s a sandwich with a topping, so what? It’s still a fucking sandwich.

  • mikey
    Posted October 12, 2007 at 12:45 pm | Permalink

    piqued is correct though looking at his blog I do not like the idea of it with tomato and cucumber. Croque Madam is the same but with an egg on top. A CM is basically 2 cheese and ham toasts , then put on top of each other.
    The sandwich IS a British invention, along with Association Football, Rugby and Cricket.
    Tomorrow when we play France, have a sandwich to show your colours!!

  • Posted October 12, 2007 at 12:47 pm | Permalink

    Oooh you do exaggerate so… Yes, a form of sandwich. But not strictly speaking ‘a sandwich’

    Do you mind watching you language please, there are children in here, chilling

  • mikey
    Posted October 12, 2007 at 12:50 pm | Permalink

    Regarding the Tesco direct ad . The bloke has his lighter on hand to light the candles. Does this tell us anything??
    Also if you have lit (the rather chi-chi) candlebra (?) why would you keep all the lights on?

  • Posted October 12, 2007 at 12:51 pm | Permalink

    Bread, filling, bread (that’s a sandwich), topping (that’s still a sandwich with some topping). My internet research brings up pictures of sandwiches with melted cheese on the top … that’s a sandwich yes? Yes?

  • Posted October 12, 2007 at 12:56 pm | Permalink

    My apologies for being initially unfamiliar with the concept of a ‘croque monsieur’, by the way. Swineshead has pointed out on a vastly inferior site to this one that anyone who’s not heard of one is an idiot but, Swineshead, think abaht it lad. It’s not beyond the bounds of possibility that someone’s not heard of one of these sandwiches if:

    1. They’ve only been through France on their way to Belgium.
    2. They don’t eat French sandwiches.
    2. They’ve lived in Lincolnshire for many many years.
    3. They were under the impression that bread, filling, bread, topping had another word for it other than the universally accepted ’sandwich’.

  • Posted October 12, 2007 at 12:57 pm | Permalink

    3. They were under the impression that bread, filling, bread, topping had NO another word for it other than the universally accepted ’sandwich’ … I should have said.

  • Posted October 12, 2007 at 12:59 pm | Permalink

    3. They were under the impression that bread, filling, bread, topping had NO OTHER word for it other than the universally accepted ’sandwich’ … I should have said the first and second time.

  • Posted October 12, 2007 at 12:59 pm | Permalink

    3. They were under the impression that bread, filling, bread, topping had NO OTHER word for it than the universally accepted ’sandwich’ … I should have said the first and second time and, indeed, the third time.

  • Posted October 12, 2007 at 1:00 pm | Permalink

    This is English in ACTION, kids!

  • Posted October 12, 2007 at 1:02 pm | Permalink

    So, Piqued, it’s a form of sandwich but not a sandwich.
    Right, that’s cleared that up then.

    You’ve never stopped the night in France, Napoleon? Any reason why?

  • Posted October 12, 2007 at 1:11 pm | Permalink

    Cowardice in the face of the enemy perpertrated between the years 1940 and 1945, mainly. Ho ho! Only joking! Ha ha!

    I’ve just never got round to it, Swineshead. I got into an Eastern European frame of mind and got m’self stuck in a rut of post-communist fun ‘n’ games for years ‘n’ years. I was planning on going to Paris, but now I’m not so sure. I like sandwiches, see? I’m not sure how kindly I’d take to ‘forms’ of sandwiches.

  • Posted October 12, 2007 at 1:20 pm | Permalink

    SH, you’re correct

    That is why I stipulated ‘Croque Monsieur’, I was being specific and making it clear that I wasn’t eating a fucking ham and cheese toasted sandwich, I was eating a Croque Monsieur, which, in addition to being an accurate description of my dinner, requires less words than ‘a fucking ham and cheese toasted sandwich’ making it succinct to boot

    In the same way, as pointed out on my (not a vastly inferior, thanks NC ) website I had an Omelette last night as opposed to ‘some eggs what I mixed all up and fried whilst agitating for a minute or two’

    I may have a baked dough tonight covered in a tomato sauce with herbs and seasoning topped with mozerella cheese and pepperoni, grilled, and, just to spite you NC, garnished with rocket. Or will I just have A CUNTING PIZZA

    I could supply a fuck load of other examples but I’m off out for a fag

  • mikey
    Posted October 12, 2007 at 1:20 pm | Permalink

    Cheese and ham on toast is not a sandwich!
    Make 2 cheese and ham on toasts and put one on top of the other = CM.

    Across Europe the method of heating bread and the result is called a toasti…France, Holland, Belgium, Germany.

    A sandwich is cold and has a filling…named after the Earl of Sandwich who invented this.

    Keep everything seperate otherwise we could say that a Pizza is an open toasted sandwich!!

  • Posted October 12, 2007 at 1:22 pm | Permalink

    OOOOOOOH – Get him!

    Mikey – don’t be silly, we all know a pizza is a savoury cake.

  • Posted October 12, 2007 at 1:29 pm | Permalink

    ‘some eggs what I mixed all up and fried whilst agitating for a minute or two’

    Even when he’s trying to do common talk, he shows his true colours with the word ‘agitating’. Nice try, y’lordship.

    And I think you’ll find you were eating a ham and cheese toastie Piqued. Just because you forgot to put the cheese inside, and had to stick it on top as an after-thought, doesn’t stop it being what it is. Which is a sandwich, like.

  • Posted October 12, 2007 at 1:30 pm | Permalink

    WWM is imploding over the definition of a snack.

  • Posted October 12, 2007 at 1:34 pm | Permalink

    The cheese goes inside and on top NC, have you learned nuffin’?

    (Since when has ‘agitating’ been the preserve of the chattering classes?)

  • Posted October 12, 2007 at 1:40 pm | Permalink

    Blame Piqued. I wonder what he calls a Chicken Kiev? “I’ll hev a Kiev de Poulet, my man, Bernard Matthew’s’s’s’ finest, if you please.”

  • Posted October 12, 2007 at 1:44 pm | Permalink

    Still doesn’t stop it being a sandwich Piqued, you flappy posh sod.

    And the word ‘agitating’ isn’t the preserve of the chattering classes – describing mixing eggs up in a pan as ‘agitating’ them is though. Very Nigella.

  • Posted October 12, 2007 at 1:56 pm | Permalink

    I forgot to mention Mikey’s comment:

    “The sandwich IS a British invention, along with Association Football, Rugby and Cricket.”

    And sausages, don’t forget that fact.

  • Posted October 12, 2007 at 1:58 pm | Permalink

    I call a Chicken Kiev precisely that; only a cunt would prefix Chicken Kiev with Bernard Matthews salmonella / foot and mouth dealer.

  • Posted October 12, 2007 at 2:05 pm | Permalink

    Again, I refer you back to the FACT that it was the swift actions of kindly old Bernard (though admittedly not as kindly since the price hike) that saved us from any outbreak. As a chicken can’t get foot ‘n’ mouth, you can hardly fire that one Bernard’s way. You need Bernard therapy to get over your anti-Bernard feelings. I heartily recommend you sit down in front of Last of the Summer Wine with three Bernard Matthews Chicken Kievs and a ham ‘n’ cheese toastie. Lovely!

  • Posted October 12, 2007 at 2:16 pm | Permalink

    Kindly multi millionaire Bernard, I am surprised at you defending him with such vehemence. Having said that I’m not, you resemble the village peasant doffing his cap to the Squire because he didn’t throw you orf his land when your wife died of consumption.

  • Posted October 12, 2007 at 2:28 pm | Permalink

    And I’m surprised you get so worked up about him. He’s only a poultry farmer Piqued, calm down son, easy, easy. You’ll do y’self an injury getting all ‘agitated’ like that.

  • Posted October 12, 2007 at 2:37 pm | Permalink

    Me get worked up… Pot, kettle etc.,

    He’s not just a poultry farmer, he’s a fucking loaded menace to society who can’t fucking speak proper

  • Posted October 12, 2007 at 2:42 pm | Permalink

    A bit like you not being able to say ’sandwich’? You and Bernard are two peas in the same pod. You should have sex with Bernard. O’course, Bernard being vastly superior to you in strength, ability to identify what is and isn’t ‘bootiful’, general intellect, and number of Chicken Kievs sold to a grateful British public, you’d have to be the lady in the relationship.

  • Posted October 12, 2007 at 2:48 pm | Permalink

    Not a bad idea, I’d stuff my freckle full of organic free-range chicken, the natural goodness would eat through the papery skin of his helm and poison him 2 DETHZ

  • Posted October 12, 2007 at 2:58 pm | Permalink

    So you like the idea of being bent over and taught a lesson about food hygiene by a grizzled old turkey farmer do you? You’re a disgrace. I, being a man of taste, would prefer my culinary ‘conversations’ take place with the lovely Nigella.

  • Posted October 12, 2007 at 3:14 pm | Permalink

    I’d sacrifice my nipsy for the sake of mankind NC, much like our Lord did when he died on the toliet in Memphis

  • Posted October 12, 2007 at 4:44 pm | Permalink

    I always thought Elvis died on the toilet? What’s this ‘toliet’ of which you speak?

  • Who
    Posted October 15, 2007 at 11:35 am | Permalink

    The storm has abated now I think, but I couldn’t contribute to this on Friday because I was in Nofuck having sex with Bernard – bootiful. And he didn’t scrimp on the post-coital melted garlic butter massage either, let me tell you.

  • Posted October 15, 2007 at 4:05 pm | Permalink

    Martine is gorgeous!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
    That’s why I have her as my background on myspace!

  • Posted October 16, 2007 at 1:13 pm | Permalink

    Robert, you’re a steaming great nitwit

Post a Comment

Your email is never shared. Required fields are marked *

*
*