<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Apprentice 2008 &#8211; Ep. 2</title>
	<atom:link href="http://watchwithmothers.net/2008/04/03/the-apprentice-2008-ep-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://watchwithmothers.net/2008/04/03/the-apprentice-2008-ep-2/</link>
	<description>We watch TV so you don&#039;t have to</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 01:45:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: The Apprentice 2008 - Ep. 4 &#171; Watch With Mothers</title>
		<link>http://watchwithmothers.net/2008/04/03/the-apprentice-2008-ep-2/comment-page-2/#comment-4751</link>
		<dc:creator>The Apprentice 2008 - Ep. 4 &#171; Watch With Mothers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 17:39:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://watchwithmothers.wordpress.com/?p=266#comment-4751</guid>
		<description>[...] 1 Episode 2 Episode [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 1 Episode 2 Episode [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Apprentice 2008: Ep. 5 &#171; Watch With Mothers</title>
		<link>http://watchwithmothers.net/2008/04/03/the-apprentice-2008-ep-2/comment-page-2/#comment-4752</link>
		<dc:creator>The Apprentice 2008: Ep. 5 &#171; Watch With Mothers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 17:37:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://watchwithmothers.wordpress.com/?p=266#comment-4752</guid>
		<description>[...] 1 Episode 2 Episode 3 Episode [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 1 Episode 2 Episode 3 Episode [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Apprentice 2008 - Ep. 7 &#171; Watch With Mothers</title>
		<link>http://watchwithmothers.net/2008/04/03/the-apprentice-2008-ep-2/comment-page-2/#comment-4750</link>
		<dc:creator>The Apprentice 2008 - Ep. 7 &#171; Watch With Mothers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 16:18:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://watchwithmothers.wordpress.com/?p=266#comment-4750</guid>
		<description>[...] 1 Episode 2 Episode 3 Episode 4 Episode 5 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 1 Episode 2 Episode 3 Episode 4 Episode 5 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Apprentice 2008: Ep. 6 &#171; Watch With Mothers</title>
		<link>http://watchwithmothers.net/2008/04/03/the-apprentice-2008-ep-2/comment-page-2/#comment-4749</link>
		<dc:creator>The Apprentice 2008: Ep. 6 &#171; Watch With Mothers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2008 10:37:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://watchwithmothers.wordpress.com/?p=266#comment-4749</guid>
		<description>[...] 1 Episode 2 Episode 3 Episode 4 Episode [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 1 Episode 2 Episode 3 Episode 4 Episode [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim</title>
		<link>http://watchwithmothers.net/2008/04/03/the-apprentice-2008-ep-2/comment-page-2/#comment-4748</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Apr 2008 14:41:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://watchwithmothers.wordpress.com/?p=266#comment-4748</guid>
		<description>You wait, if she&#039;s anything to do with getting to the last few candidates she&#039;ll fade into the background and after this weeks performance so will Raef.  Still we can always strain go get proof she&#039;s as mad as a box of ginger frogs.

Speaking of fading into the background someone somewhere else noted that Clare is this years&#039; Badger and strangely they considered Raef was this years&#039; Tre!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You wait, if she&#8217;s anything to do with getting to the last few candidates she&#8217;ll fade into the background and after this weeks performance so will Raef.  Still we can always strain go get proof she&#8217;s as mad as a box of ginger frogs.</p>
<p>Speaking of fading into the background someone somewhere else noted that Clare is this years&#8217; Badger and strangely they considered Raef was this years&#8217; Tre!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Napoleon Cockaparte</title>
		<link>http://watchwithmothers.net/2008/04/03/the-apprentice-2008-ep-2/comment-page-2/#comment-4747</link>
		<dc:creator>Napoleon Cockaparte</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Apr 2008 09:26:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://watchwithmothers.wordpress.com/?p=266#comment-4747</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m crossing my fingers that Jenny gets stabbed in the vagina.

*crosses fingers*</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m crossing my fingers that Jenny gets stabbed in the vagina.</p>
<p>*crosses fingers*</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim</title>
		<link>http://watchwithmothers.net/2008/04/03/the-apprentice-2008-ep-2/comment-page-2/#comment-4746</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2008 14:47:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://watchwithmothers.wordpress.com/?p=266#comment-4746</guid>
		<description>Completely shameless, but only because I&#039;ve moved to Wordpress! lol

I&#039;m looking forward to how much of a mess the two teams make this week! If they can manage to argue amongst themselves so brilliantly who know what depths of management speak they can descend to when the kitchen gets hotter?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Completely shameless, but only because I&#8217;ve moved to Wordpress! lol</p>
<p>I&#8217;m looking forward to how much of a mess the two teams make this week! If they can manage to argue amongst themselves so brilliantly who know what depths of management speak they can descend to when the kitchen gets hotter?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Swineshead</title>
		<link>http://watchwithmothers.net/2008/04/03/the-apprentice-2008-ep-2/comment-page-2/#comment-4745</link>
		<dc:creator>Swineshead</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2008 11:45:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://watchwithmothers.wordpress.com/?p=266#comment-4745</guid>
		<description>Yeah that one was a bit like he&#039;d cut and pasted it all over the interweb...
Gita -I forgot to thankyou for your enormous comment / review earlier.

But how do you know his beard is encrusted with goose liver? Have you sniffed his face-fuzz before...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah that one was a bit like he&#8217;d cut and pasted it all over the interweb&#8230;<br />
Gita -I forgot to thankyou for your enormous comment / review earlier.</p>
<p>But how do you know his beard is encrusted with goose liver? Have you sniffed his face-fuzz before&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gita</title>
		<link>http://watchwithmothers.net/2008/04/03/the-apprentice-2008-ep-2/comment-page-2/#comment-4744</link>
		<dc:creator>Gita</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2008 11:42:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://watchwithmothers.wordpress.com/?p=266#comment-4744</guid>
		<description>SHAMELESS PLUG.

Have you no shame, man?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>SHAMELESS PLUG.</p>
<p>Have you no shame, man?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim</title>
		<link>http://watchwithmothers.net/2008/04/03/the-apprentice-2008-ep-2/comment-page-2/#comment-4743</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Apr 2008 20:26:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://watchwithmothers.wordpress.com/?p=266#comment-4743</guid>
		<description>Yay, The Apprentice. Causes so much fuss it&#039;s a great laugh, oops sorry interview. On my own blog I go on and on (probably too much I suspect) about the Ginger Genny. But hey it&#039;s mine own! Should she have gone? Well of course with brass knobs on!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yay, The Apprentice. Causes so much fuss it&#8217;s a great laugh, oops sorry interview. On my own blog I go on and on (probably too much I suspect) about the Ginger Genny. But hey it&#8217;s mine own! Should she have gone? Well of course with brass knobs on!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Swineshead</title>
		<link>http://watchwithmothers.net/2008/04/03/the-apprentice-2008-ep-2/comment-page-2/#comment-4742</link>
		<dc:creator>Swineshead</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2008 08:27:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://watchwithmothers.wordpress.com/?p=266#comment-4742</guid>
		<description>You fancy Raef?

Oh dear, oh dear.

As mentioned before, I have a weird thing for Sara.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You fancy Raef?</p>
<p>Oh dear, oh dear.</p>
<p>As mentioned before, I have a weird thing for Sara.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gita</title>
		<link>http://watchwithmothers.net/2008/04/03/the-apprentice-2008-ep-2/comment-page-2/#comment-4741</link>
		<dc:creator>Gita</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 18:44:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://watchwithmothers.wordpress.com/?p=266#comment-4741</guid>
		<description>Attending to laundry appropriately is in the xx chromosome phenotype. As the bearer of said chromosomes, I was absolutely cringing at the girls&#039; incompetence.  £5000 for one night&#039;s work is extraordinary by anyone&#039;s standard, and they didn&#039;t even have to compromise their (questionable?) virtue.

I would lick Alan Sugar&#039;s  foie gras-encrusted beard for less.

Back to the task, and I was impressed by the stunningly short period of time it took for someone to mention the (literally impossible) application of more than 100% effort. [Raef, for your memory; 110%].

The desperate pleas for tips (monetary or ellucidating) was absolutely mortifying for the women&#039;s team.  Couple my general discomfort with cadging extra coppers out of clients with my visceral dislike of Jenny &quot;Underbite&quot; Celerier, and you had me practically hurling empy Cava bottles at the screen.

Particularly hilarious was when the South African woman refused to tip the girls, following abject loss of laundry, and the the Ginger Ninja had the AUDACITY to look annoyed.

All that said, despite being a colossal prat, I have mayjah love for Raef.  He is hot; hair needs work, as does general deportment, but sweet Christ on the cross, he is gorgeous.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Attending to laundry appropriately is in the xx chromosome phenotype. As the bearer of said chromosomes, I was absolutely cringing at the girls&#8217; incompetence.  £5000 for one night&#8217;s work is extraordinary by anyone&#8217;s standard, and they didn&#8217;t even have to compromise their (questionable?) virtue.</p>
<p>I would lick Alan Sugar&#8217;s  foie gras-encrusted beard for less.</p>
<p>Back to the task, and I was impressed by the stunningly short period of time it took for someone to mention the (literally impossible) application of more than 100% effort. [Raef, for your memory; 110%].</p>
<p>The desperate pleas for tips (monetary or ellucidating) was absolutely mortifying for the women&#8217;s team.  Couple my general discomfort with cadging extra coppers out of clients with my visceral dislike of Jenny &#8220;Underbite&#8221; Celerier, and you had me practically hurling empy Cava bottles at the screen.</p>
<p>Particularly hilarious was when the South African woman refused to tip the girls, following abject loss of laundry, and the the Ginger Ninja had the AUDACITY to look annoyed.</p>
<p>All that said, despite being a colossal prat, I have mayjah love for Raef.  He is hot; hair needs work, as does general deportment, but sweet Christ on the cross, he is gorgeous.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Napoleon Cockaparte</title>
		<link>http://watchwithmothers.net/2008/04/03/the-apprentice-2008-ep-2/comment-page-2/#comment-4740</link>
		<dc:creator>Napoleon Cockaparte</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 14:33:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://watchwithmothers.wordpress.com/?p=266#comment-4740</guid>
		<description>Hmmm. I&#039;m sort of grumbling a bit over &#039;ere that we both should be right. Muttering to m&#039;self in front of my keyboard. Mutter mutter ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmmm. I&#8217;m sort of grumbling a bit over &#8216;ere that we both should be right. Muttering to m&#8217;self in front of my keyboard. Mutter mutter &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Swineshead</title>
		<link>http://watchwithmothers.net/2008/04/03/the-apprentice-2008-ep-2/comment-page-1/#comment-4739</link>
		<dc:creator>Swineshead</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 14:21:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://watchwithmothers.wordpress.com/?p=266#comment-4739</guid>
		<description>In the context of the story of the show - no - it&#039;s illogical like you say.

But the makers credit us with the intelligence that we understand they have to please the audience, so he kept her in, which is logical.

So we are both right.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the context of the story of the show &#8211; no &#8211; it&#8217;s illogical like you say.</p>
<p>But the makers credit us with the intelligence that we understand they have to please the audience, so he kept her in, which is logical.</p>
<p>So we are both right.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Napoleon Cockaparte</title>
		<link>http://watchwithmothers.net/2008/04/03/the-apprentice-2008-ep-2/comment-page-1/#comment-4738</link>
		<dc:creator>Napoleon Cockaparte</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 14:18:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://watchwithmothers.wordpress.com/?p=266#comment-4738</guid>
		<description>But that&#039;s the flaw. If he was being logical (and not just keeping in the nasty one in for the purpose of ratings), he&#039;d have got rid of her. Logically, an employer wouldn&#039;t want to keep hold of a horrible, useless cunt (sorry, Paul) if they were on the hunt for a new employee. If he&#039;s going to pretend it&#039;s a job interview, and not fluff, then, logically, he should have sacked Jenny.

So he&#039;s not using fucking logic there, is he? YES? YES?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But that&#8217;s the flaw. If he was being logical (and not just keeping in the nasty one in for the purpose of ratings), he&#8217;d have got rid of her. Logically, an employer wouldn&#8217;t want to keep hold of a horrible, useless cunt (sorry, Paul) if they were on the hunt for a new employee. If he&#8217;s going to pretend it&#8217;s a job interview, and not fluff, then, logically, he should have sacked Jenny.</p>
<p>So he&#8217;s not using fucking logic there, is he? YES? YES?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
