One Minute Review: The Cottage

The Cottage

The Cottage stars him off League of Gentleman, him off of those dreadful Lord Up Them Rings movies and her wot’s off of Brookside with the whopping great melons. The first two kidnap the other one and dump her in a cottage. Spudgun off of Bottom turns up, and then everyone gets murdered by a big fella with really rubbish makeup.

This is how they meet their sticky ends:

  • Bird off of Brookside with the big tits: Spade straight through the face. It’s a good death is this - shame she doesn’t spill her knockers and give us men a shot at them puppies.
  • He off of them crappy Lord! Oh My Rings! movies: Pickaxe through the chest. Bit rubbish after her with the tits gets ‘erself a faceful of spade.
  • Spudgun: Ploughing thing up the unmentionables, then gutted. Spudders doesn’t like it! He don’t like it one fucking bit, sorr! Bejaysus, to be sure, to be sure!
  • Him off of The League Of Gentlemen: Attacked by a family in the cellar. This is the last bit of the film, and therefore:

THIS REVIEW CONTAINS SPOILERS.

My verdict? RUBBISH! Five stars.

57 Comments

  • Posted April 9, 2008 at 8:50 am | Permalink

    You are way better than Kermode.

    That girl’s wangers are so big they’ve passed the point of no return.

    They’re sillytits.

  • Posted April 9, 2008 at 9:05 am | Permalink

    I still wouldn’t kick ‘em out of bed, mind.

  • John Q Wagonwheel
    Posted April 9, 2008 at 9:44 am | Permalink

    No prizes for guessing how she got her job on Brookside.

  • John Q Wagonwheel
    Posted April 9, 2008 at 9:45 am | Permalink

    She probably auditioned, the minx.

  • Clarys
    Posted April 9, 2008 at 9:55 am | Permalink

    The bra doesn’t even fit!

  • Posted April 9, 2008 at 10:05 am | Permalink

    A rogue aureole is popping round the front

  • Posted April 9, 2008 at 10:06 am | Permalink

    Is anyone else hungover today?
    I am. Enormously.

  • Posted April 9, 2008 at 10:27 am | Permalink

    I’m not. I feel GRRRRRRREAT.

  • Mr Chipz
    Posted April 9, 2008 at 11:11 am | Permalink

    I too, am fine. I just dun the missus too so I’m chipper.

    That brooksides bird’s melons are very big aren’t they. I don’t think they’re real cos they don’t seem to fit the girl’s build. No seriously, i think they might be fake tits.

    The fucking whore.

  • Who
    Posted April 9, 2008 at 11:11 am | Permalink

    I’m sure them doggone melons never used to be that big. Did they? Eh? Lads? Eh?

  • Posted April 9, 2008 at 11:26 am | Permalink

    She put some jelly in them I think.
    Some kind of jelly. Green jelly. Lime.

  • Posted April 9, 2008 at 11:50 am | Permalink

    I agree with Chipz. This woman is nothing but a big-breasted, painted, jezebel, WHORE. Summary justice is called for - three times round the football pitches in just her underwear. Then a jizz-bath.

    The hell-bound succubus.

  • Gita
    Posted April 9, 2008 at 12:27 pm | Permalink

    Boys, boys, boys.

    For goodness sake. When did the comments section turn into the Sun? (I’m struggling to maintain my stern, schoolmistress attitude, but her breasts! For god’s sake, her breasts! They’re ridiculous, actually, and you can bet they look a state unhinged from what must be considerable hardware.)

    Right, back to the matter at hand: NC, surely it can’t be rubbish. I mean, anything that features a “television personality/glamour model, WAG-wannabee has GOT to be in-depth viewing.

  • Posted April 9, 2008 at 12:48 pm | Permalink

    Boys, boys, boys
    I’m lookin for a good time
    Boys, boys, boys
    I’m ready for your love!

    Gita - was that an intended quote? Big breasted Spanish lovely Sabrina sang those very words in the 80s, in a swimming pool, with all her boobs all spilling out of her swimming costume.

    http://youtube/watch?v=YvstDQIG5Kk

  • Posted April 9, 2008 at 12:48 pm | Permalink

    TETAS GRANDES

  • Gita
    Posted April 9, 2008 at 12:49 pm | Permalink

    It was intentional!

    Well done!

  • Posted April 9, 2008 at 12:52 pm | Permalink

    No - well done you Gita. You actually win a prize.

  • Gita
    Posted April 9, 2008 at 12:57 pm | Permalink

    ..as long as it’s not a jizz-bath.

  • Posted April 9, 2008 at 1:01 pm | Permalink

    It’s a genuine Watch With Mothers stool.
    Where shall I send it?

  • Posted April 9, 2008 at 1:01 pm | Permalink

    PHWOOOOAAAR! Thanks for the link there - lovely stuff. I love tits, me.

    And it was rubbish, Gita. That’s why I gave it five stars. Any film where a gobby Liverpudlian gets her face cut in half with a spade has to be good. Even though it’s also rubbish - like EastEnders and Holby. GOOD RUBBISH, as opposed to BAD RUBBISH (see: Grand Designs, Masterchef, the blog ‘Piqued’, etc.).

  • Posted April 9, 2008 at 1:09 pm | Permalink

    I’m tempted to amend the banner so it reads ‘Tits Week’

  • Posted April 9, 2008 at 1:13 pm | Permalink

    I wouldn’t moan. I’ve seen THOUSANDS of films where the tits were the best bit. THOUSANDS.

  • Who
    Posted April 9, 2008 at 1:18 pm | Permalink

    Sabrina, Sinitta, Sonia, Spagna

    PUT THEM ALL IN A BIG 80′S JIZZ BATH

  • Gita
    Posted April 9, 2008 at 1:18 pm | Permalink

    Excuse me, sir, but I take portentous issue with your claim that Grand Designs is rubbish. Watching spoiled toffs and ecohabitant-wannabees (with their 4000 litre Hummer parked on the Mongolian packed-peat drive) fail miserably at budgeting and grasping basic physics is highly gratifying.

  • Gita
    Posted April 9, 2008 at 1:23 pm | Permalink

    SH: re the stool:

    Gita (Professional Dilettante)
    The Hermitage
    Glasgow.

  • Posted April 9, 2008 at 1:25 pm | Permalink

    Ah - sorry - that address is in Scotland.

    I don’t do any business with the Scotches, least of all the Scotch Postal Service. The Scots are savages - NC told me.

  • Posted April 9, 2008 at 1:27 pm | Permalink

    Yes, but they’re not all loaded are they Gita? Still, at least someone round here has viewing tastes…

    I bet you like to go out as well don’t you

  • Posted April 9, 2008 at 1:34 pm | Permalink

    Yes Piqued - they are all loaded. I proved that ages ago.

    *wins*

  • Gita
    Posted April 9, 2008 at 1:38 pm | Permalink

    If they’re not all loaded, then I demand to know what their secret is. Are there certain architects who accept - ahem - favours in lieu of cash for their services? I am not above drawing cheeky blueprints or something if it means I can have a baroque castle on the middle of my own man-made island.

  • Gita
    Posted April 9, 2008 at 1:39 pm | Permalink

    SH: I’m not really Scottish; I just live here, to my ultimate and undying shame. FAIR IS FAIR. NOW WHERE IS MY PRIZE?

  • Posted April 9, 2008 at 1:51 pm | Permalink

    There I was thinking I had an ally

    They’re not all loaded love (you made me patronsie you, that’s your fault) there have been a few where the protagonists sold their house for 200,000 and bought land for 20k etc and completed the build for the difference

    If they go over budget they can mortgage the property being built which is usally worth 2 or 3 times the cost of the orginal land fee/build

    It’s a peice of fucking piss,

    piss

  • Posted April 9, 2008 at 1:51 pm | Permalink

    and it’s ‘patronise’ before you start

  • Gita
    Posted April 9, 2008 at 1:56 pm | Permalink

    Don’t worry, Piqued. I’m with you on Grand Designs. Those other chaps are just angsty because they secretly want a private session with Kevin McCloud. And he doesn’t even HAVE titties. Fags.

  • Posted April 9, 2008 at 2:07 pm | Permalink

    Hey - curb your homophobia you awful woman. Shit is in the hands of a ginger postman as we speak.

    Piqued’s a dunce. ‘Protagonists’?!

  • Gita
    Posted April 9, 2008 at 2:13 pm | Permalink

    !

    I thought I was going to get a stool - as in, a seat suitable for playing the piano, milking cows, etc. Had I known that I was going to receive the end-result of a WWM writer’s drunkedly-consumed kebab, I would have given you my mother-in-law’s address.

    I thought protagonist was a rather arty term for “couple purchasing builder’s services” as well. Someone’s been studying for his A-level Drama exam.

  • Posted April 9, 2008 at 2:25 pm | Permalink

    Yes, you’re right Gita it was what you said about that thing that SH said I dun a misstakesz on

  • Gita
    Posted April 9, 2008 at 2:27 pm | Permalink

    I..don’t know how to formulate a proper reply to that. Anyway! WHY HAVE WE STOPPED TALKING ABOUT TITTIES?

    Surely we could have -ho ho- milked that one a little more?

  • Posted April 9, 2008 at 2:30 pm | Permalink

    Gita, that’s udderly* ridiculous

    *misspelt for comedy purposes

  • Gita
    Posted April 9, 2008 at 2:35 pm | Permalink

    Oh dear, oh dear. This discussion is about to cup-size into the turgid waters of punnery.

  • Gita
    Posted April 9, 2008 at 2:37 pm | Permalink

    *looks around for someone to high-five with*

  • Posted April 9, 2008 at 3:02 pm | Permalink

    “The Scots are savages - NC told me.”

    Tis true, I know, I’m one of them.

    Course the problem up here in Scotchland, especially the Glasweegie bit, is that once people reach the age of thirty, they all look, dress and sound the same. Mebbe, it’s because it’s alway buckin freezing, but wander through certain parts of Glasgow, and all you see is wizened midgets in second hand greatcoats and bunnets. And that’s the wimmin collecting their child benefit.

    On the upside, every woman between the age of 14 and 29 wears little bar a crop top within the bottom half cut off and a belt around her front and rear bottoms. So, depending on what takes your fancy, it’s all breast milk and buttock cleavage.

    Which, thankfully, gets things back on topic. The topic being HOW GREAT ARE BREASTS. But only on wimmin. None of that manbreast nonsense. That’s just wrong and only permissible in the dankest regions of Lahndan Town. Deviant barstards.

  • John Q Wagonwheel
    Posted April 9, 2008 at 3:04 pm | Permalink

    Oh god, two of you at it, it’s a DOUBLE D-SCRACE!

  • Posted April 9, 2008 at 3:05 pm | Permalink

    Hang on…

    *does the maths*

    That means Mr H and Gita are both in Glasgow.

    Why don’t you both go for a little drink together and report back to us on how it went?

  • Gita
    Posted April 9, 2008 at 3:06 pm | Permalink

    Bra-vo! That was titillating!

  • John Q Wagonwheel
    Posted April 9, 2008 at 3:06 pm | Permalink

    (speld foaneticly) else it’d have been D-sgrace.

    SHUT UP

  • Posted April 9, 2008 at 3:08 pm | Permalink

    That was the breast one yet.
    I know you’ve got your knockers, but I think you’re teat-riffic.

    *watches life ebb away*

  • John Q Wagonwheel
    Posted April 9, 2008 at 3:09 pm | Permalink

    Is that the breast you can do?

  • John Q Wagonwheel
    Posted April 9, 2008 at 3:09 pm | Permalink

    oh damn we went for the same one at the same time. went tits-up, rather*

    *not a pun.

  • Posted April 9, 2008 at 3:11 pm | Permalink

    I’m getting a bit bored of tits. Thank God the Apprentice is on tonight.

  • Gita
    Posted April 9, 2008 at 3:11 pm | Permalink

    Now you’ve racked it.

  • John Q Wagonwheel
    Posted April 9, 2008 at 3:12 pm | Permalink

    Yeah, I feel a boob.

  • John Q Wagonwheel
    Posted April 9, 2008 at 3:13 pm | Permalink

    It’s a mammary I’ll want to forget.

  • Posted April 9, 2008 at 3:14 pm | Permalink

    Eckshually, I’m from Embra Toon, poshest place on the planet. At least, I am when I’m trying it on with the LADIES.

    Really I’m fae Leith, a town that thought Trainspotting was glamorous.

    However, I’ll be in Glesgae tomorrow night and will happily look at any BREASTS that are presented to me*. I’ll even take my camera.

    * the Mr H exemption clause. This specifically excludes BREASTS that are saggy, aged or attached to a man**.

    ** the Mr H exemption clause secundus. Unless they are attached to me, and their primary location remains on a WOMAN.

  • Posted April 9, 2008 at 3:15 pm | Permalink

    AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH double mastectomy!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    Oh…

    *runs off*

  • Gita
    Posted April 9, 2008 at 3:15 pm | Permalink

    John - we had better stop. What if Jennifer Ellison reads this? It would totally knocker confidence.

  • Posted April 9, 2008 at 3:18 pm | Permalink

    Jennifer Ellison?

    Reads?

    Even if she could, how would she see over the top of her BREASTS

  • John Q Wagonwheel
    Posted April 9, 2008 at 3:31 pm | Permalink

    Don’t know who she is. But yes we must stop, I think I’ll go and watch a film. Hitchcock perhaps…nork by nork-breast?

Post a Comment

Your email is never shared. Required fields are marked *

*
*