EastEnders

GusSean

What on earth have the writers of EastEnders got against Gus and his elderly dog, Wellard? Over the last few weeks they have decided to hand him over to monstrous psychopath, Sean – a cartoon character that belongs in a low-grade horror movie. Why?

Gus, who regular viewers of ‘Enders know as a happy-go-lucky, poetic road sweeper has been prodded, poked, imprisoned, and now tortured by Sean. His dog, Wellard, has been threatened with a stick, yanked around the square in a way you just shouldn’t treat old dogs, and locked in a cupboard without food or water for what seemed like the best part of the day. This has bewildered me.

Have the writers been taking their cues from Hostel or the Saw movies? Who thought this horrible, uncomfortable, and downright nasty storyline was right for an early-evening family soap opera? “Things have got stale in the square,” someone says, “let’s torture Gus.”

In the twenty-odd years I’ve been watching this show, there have been plenty of dreadful and unpleasant storylines: Stella’s bullying of Ben that left you feeling dirty after watching it, the disasterous Ferera family of Asian stereotypes, Kevin being gut-punched by the engine block of a Ford Focus, Pat naked in bed with Frank, but Gus’s trip down the rabbithole of Sean’s one dimensional psychosis takes the biscuit.

This storyline is vile. It interrupts the flow of the show. It lands in peril two minor characters that you felt assured weren’t there to be put in peril. And certainly not by brutal shitbags like Sean – the most badly handled character the show has ever produced.

I don’t want to see Gus being tied up, beaten, bullied, and imprisoned. I feel cheated by the EastEnders writers. I was so angry with the treatment of Wellard, I wrote the BBC a letter. That’s right - a letter. Good, if ultimately useless characters like Gus aren’t there to be shown the instruments by bad and completely useless characters like Sean. They’re there to attend stag nights, fill out the numbers in the Vic, and drink the health of more important characters when they either marry, or die.

What next? Phil battering Keith and Ghenghis to death with a pool cue?

Blog Widget by LinkWithin

Post to Twitter Tweet This!

82 Comments

  • Posted April 29, 2008 at 4:08 pm | Permalink

    (sorry)

  • Posted April 29, 2008 at 4:22 pm | Permalink

    S’alright.

  • Clarry
    Posted April 29, 2008 at 4:45 pm | Permalink

    I felt so strongly about this I cut and paste my remarks from an earlier posting regarding the above.

    “Yeah. I’ve been boycotting ‘Enders recently, which hurts me more than it hurts them as i’ve been a loyal fan since the beginning. HOWEVER, I turned on the telly last night and caught the last few moments of Sean crunching his knuckles whilst asking the tied-up-Gus to sit still whilst he administered some more pain. What? What’s happened, are the writers ill?”

  • Posted April 29, 2008 at 4:54 pm | Permalink

    I missed last night’s. Perhaps this thread will serve us well tomorrow.

  • Posted April 29, 2008 at 4:54 pm | Permalink

    You have to wonder. I’m not above the torturing, maiming, imprisonment, and murder of characters in soaps, as long as they are the right characters. Den, for example, deserved to have his head stoved in with an ornamental iron dog – it was a natural conclusion to his evil bastard storyline arc. Gus has no such arc. He is a man with a dog who drinks beer with the square’s other unecessary, yet necessary, characters. Having him bullied and tied up by Sean – a see-through Jack Nicholson in The Shining rip-off – is ridiculous, and takes your attention off the other idiotic stories going on. Why Gus? Did they stick all the minor characters’ names into a hat marked ‘Bit-Player That Needs Torturing For No Earthly Reason’? Can we look forward to the sudden garrotting of Minty now?

  • John Q Wagonwheel
    Posted April 30, 2008 at 2:39 am | Permalink

    Cor you wait ages for a post and then three come at once.

  • Posted April 30, 2008 at 7:57 am | Permalink

    I caught up on the Eastenders backlog yesterday. And it was shit.

    Roxy and that thick Branning lug – revolting.
    Ian Beale and his daughter – couldn’t care less.
    Stephen Wickes and his gayness – please don’t start a whole new plot about false claims of gay harrassment. Please? Oh shit. You’ve already started.
    Augustus and Sean – for fuck’s sake.

    Are we expected to believe that Gus wouldn’t call the fucking police? What a load of old shit.

    And isn’t Deano (not ‘Dino’ as NC referred to him recently, by which I thought he meant the Flintstone’s dog) meant to be coming back and whooping Sean’s sorry hide with his brand new psycho fists? I’ve been counting on that happening for quite a while.

  • Posted April 30, 2008 at 8:42 am | Permalink

    Dino may well be doing that.

    The show hasn’t had the faintest idea what to do with itself since Christmas. There’s too much emphasis on the children, too many pointless stories dragging on forever, and far too much stupidity. I was groaning when Stephen turned out to be gay, because EastEnders can’t handle gay stories in the same way it’s never got a handle on Asians or pub football team storylines. This WILL turn out badly.

  • Posted April 30, 2008 at 8:49 am | Permalink

    They can only really handle sexual tension within one family a la Stacey, Bradley and Max – or Roxy, Ronnie and that big lug Branning.

    Usually you have one central plot with others shooting about around it. The Max/Stacey plot was absorbing. This one isn’t.

    I might write a letter too.

  • Posted April 30, 2008 at 9:14 am | Permalink

    My letter concerned animal welfare, more than anything else.

    None of the plots are absorbing. They did the daughter running away with Frank and Diane, they did the young man suddenly discovering he’s gay with Simon ‘n’ Tony (and that was awful). Alright, so they’ve never done the imprisonment and torture of a genial road sweeper before, but then I wasn’t looking for that in the same way I don’t want to see Mickey being raped.

    I gather Gus is leaving, but that was no reason to give his character a contrived and violent send-off. Rubbish!

  • Clarry
    Posted April 30, 2008 at 9:40 am | Permalink

    I missed it last night. What happened? Did Stacey save Gus or join in?

  • Posted April 30, 2008 at 9:41 am | Permalink

    Apparently the actor punched his girlfriend in real life, so they had to suspend / sack him.
    And the bloke who plays Sean apparently hassled a model by sending her texted images of his cock. Cripes!

    Last night Stacey saved Gus but then refused to help him report her idiot brother to the coppers.

  • Posted April 30, 2008 at 9:46 am | Permalink

    The actor playing Gus? Doesn’t sound like Gus.

    I can believe Sean sends pictures of his old fella to girls, mind. Dirty sod. Modern technology is messing around with telly too much.

    Last night’s show was, if anything, even worse than the night before’s. Gus has no emotional connection to Stacey (”We’re mates, right?” says she. “Erm … no,” he should have replied, then rang the police). It was ridiculous.

  • Clarry
    Posted April 30, 2008 at 9:54 am | Permalink

    I’d heard about the-actor-who-plays-Gus being not so nice in real life, but didn’t realise that it was so bad that he was getting the chop. As for the-actor-that-plays-Sean texting pictures of his cock to a lady…. what do you expect? They’ll probably let them back eventually like Corrie did with Craig Charles after catching him reading porn and smoking crack in the back of a taxi.

    I’ve steadfastly avoided EE for ages and regret catching a glimpse of this episode as I feel certain I shall be drawn into it again.

  • Posted April 30, 2008 at 10:02 am | Permalink

    Don’t bother, Clarry. I’ve been with this show through thick ‘n’ thin, yet I’m thinking of abandoning ship. I can put up with Ted Hills, Dot murdering Ethel, the risible Tricky Dicky, Andy the nurse getting run over, Alan being arrested, and the murder of Eddie Royal, but even I draw the line at cardboard psychos torturing road sweepers for no reason.

  • Clarry
    Posted April 30, 2008 at 10:12 am | Permalink

    But I’ve always loved ‘Enders (like you NC i’ve watched it from the beginning and have forgiven them on numerous occasions) and it’s only recently that i’ve had to hand ‘em some tough love. I don’t want to not watch it, but feel I have to register my concern over flimsy plot lines and poor script writing via the viewing figures. But my will is weak, and I know that i’ll watch it on Thursday.

  • Posted April 30, 2008 at 10:14 am | Permalink

    I gave it up for three years, once upon a time.

  • Clarry
    Posted April 30, 2008 at 10:22 am | Permalink

    Three WHOLE years.

  • Posted April 30, 2008 at 10:31 am | Permalink

    Yes. impressive eh?

  • Posted April 30, 2008 at 10:56 am | Permalink

    Let me guess. When you were at university and had far better things to do than watch EastEnders?

  • Posted April 30, 2008 at 10:58 am | Permalink

    Hey, tell you what yeah, right, if you, like, HAD A LIFE, right, then you wouldn’t, like, NEED this, yeah

  • Posted April 30, 2008 at 11:01 am | Permalink

    As a saint, I’m not rising to that.

  • Posted April 30, 2008 at 11:06 am | Permalink

    Seriously though

    U R AL SAD : (

  • Posted April 30, 2008 at 11:10 am | Permalink

    Grand Designs? Masterchef? Wild Gourmets? Watching Paint Dry Celebrity Special?

  • Posted April 30, 2008 at 11:19 am | Permalink

    The first 2 yes, if you recall I slagged off 3 on here and the last one I’ve not heard of

    *looks blank*

    Is it on ITV?

    *nothing expression*

  • Posted April 30, 2008 at 11:28 am | Permalink

    The last one sums up the first three. Not that I care what you watch. I have better things to do, such as composing a letter of support to Friends of the Earth – a charity I despised two days ago.

  • Posted April 30, 2008 at 11:30 am | Permalink

    I’ve not heard of the last one though, did you make it up?

    *continues to look blank*

    *scratches arm*

    *blinks*

  • John Q Wagonwheel
    Posted April 30, 2008 at 11:40 am | Permalink

    Never watched it, never will.

  • Posted April 30, 2008 at 11:47 am | Permalink

    Piqued – Yes, my son, I made it up. It was sarcasm unworthy of a great man such as myself.

    John – Yes you will. Your wife, when she comes along, will watch it. You will then have no choice but to watch it too.

  • Posted April 30, 2008 at 11:55 am | Permalink

    Really, you made it up. Oh right

    *looks blank still*

    I’m with you

    *blinks*

  • Posted April 30, 2008 at 12:05 pm | Permalink

    John does watch it, and his hero is Ben Mitchell.

    He told me.

  • Clarry
    Posted April 30, 2008 at 12:11 pm | Permalink

    Is everyone feeling ok today?

  • Posted April 30, 2008 at 12:31 pm | Permalink

    I’m feeling great, thanks for asking.

  • Posted April 30, 2008 at 12:32 pm | Permalink

    Yes, I am well too Clarry

    I thank you for asking, but when I thank you, I mean it

    Unlike some

    *looks up*

  • Posted April 30, 2008 at 12:50 pm | Permalink

    Ah, my son, but I do believe it. Unlike you – a sinner – I have turned over a new leaf. I mean what I say, and say what I mean. You, on the other hand, have bought a one-way ticket to eternal torment with your falsehoods. You’re fucked, basically. Pardon my French. Not that there’s anything wrong with the French, etc.

    *finds it impossible to absolve Piqued of his sins*

  • Posted April 30, 2008 at 1:04 pm | Permalink

    You can believe what you want, I was merely saying you didn’t mean it, that’s all

    (have you had a poo yet by the way, I’m just curious)

  • Posted April 30, 2008 at 1:09 pm | Permalink

    I have had a poo, yes. I don’t think you’d care for the description, my son.

  • Clarry
    Posted April 30, 2008 at 1:13 pm | Permalink

    Everyone is definitely in a strange mood today….

    Where’s SH? ‘Doing some work’?

  • Posted April 30, 2008 at 1:15 pm | Permalink

    I am actually, and it’s a complete bastard of a piece of work.

  • Posted April 30, 2008 at 1:18 pm | Permalink

    I wouldn’t mind the description to be frank

    Please

  • Clarry
    Posted April 30, 2008 at 1:35 pm | Permalink

    Yes please NC, we want details!

    Was it like Nutella?

  • Clarry
    Posted April 30, 2008 at 1:37 pm | Permalink

    SH – It’s a damned nuisance when pesky work gets in the way of the stuff that really counts, isn’t it?

  • Posted April 30, 2008 at 1:39 pm | Permalink

    Yes, do hurry NC, I really can’t wait

  • Posted April 30, 2008 at 1:41 pm | Permalink

    I couldn’t, in all conscience, describe my morning curse in the presence of ladies.

  • Clarry
    Posted April 30, 2008 at 1:44 pm | Permalink

    Go on, you know you want to.

    *puts fingers in ears*

  • Posted April 30, 2008 at 1:46 pm | Permalink

    I fear I’m being tempted here.

    *resists temptation*

  • Clarry
    Posted April 30, 2008 at 1:54 pm | Permalink

    So did anyone watch embarrassing bodies/illnesses last night (about breasts)? Tonight’s installment is about fannies and I think tomorrow night is for me as it’s about willies.

  • Posted April 30, 2008 at 1:57 pm | Permalink

    You should watch something more life-affirming, Clarry. I watched an unbelievably dull but worthy programme about the Taj Mahal last night. Tonight I’m watching one of those Inside The Medieval Mind shows they’ve been running on BBC4. It’s about sex, so I’ll be switching it off and flagellating myself almost immediately.

  • Posted April 30, 2008 at 2:21 pm | Permalink

    I’ll be watching the football while V+ing the fucking Apprentice.

  • Clarry
    Posted April 30, 2008 at 2:37 pm | Permalink

    I was being sar-cars-tic. It was the most gut-churning programme ever committed to celluloid, and I fear the worst is yet to come in the willies episode. Well, if the willy bit on monday’s prog was anything to go by….

    *cleanses eyes with bleach*

  • Clarry
    Posted April 30, 2008 at 2:38 pm | Permalink

    Oh God it’s the fucking Apprentice tonight, isn’t it? I’m going to watch it, but I know i’ll hate it….

    SH, does that mean we’re not allowed to talk about the fucking Apprentice until the day after tomorrow when you’ve watched it?

  • Posted April 30, 2008 at 2:50 pm | Permalink

    I’ll watch it immediately after the football…
    In fact, I might not even bother with the football as it made me sick watching Man U win last night and I’m bound to get the same feeling no matter who wins tonight.

  • Posted April 30, 2008 at 2:52 pm | Permalink

    Now you have a V+, can’t you record several Man U games, watch one up to the point where they are about to score, then switch to another where they get trounced? Papers will supply the exact minute when they score, so you can easily avoid ‘em ever scoring anything ever again.

  • Posted April 30, 2008 at 2:55 pm | Permalink

    I could do that but I can’t be arsed.

    I hate Man U.

  • Posted April 30, 2008 at 2:56 pm | Permalink

    Well I won’t bloody bother offering a solution next time.

  • Posted April 30, 2008 at 2:57 pm | Permalink

    Hang on – that was a bit rude. A bit unchristian.

    Are you reverting to type?

  • Posted April 30, 2008 at 3:00 pm | Permalink

    Sorry about that. This being good business is a road to Hell paved with good intentions, etc.

  • Clarry
    Posted April 30, 2008 at 3:06 pm | Permalink

    I don’t know if I can bear to watch the football tonight. I’m a sore loser at the best of times, but will cry if Chelsea win.

  • Posted April 30, 2008 at 3:13 pm | Permalink

    Clarry – You don’t need to pretend to like football here.

  • Posted April 30, 2008 at 3:14 pm | Permalink

    I’ll smash something when either of ‘em wins.

    Because Liverpool are lucky bastards to be there after all that penalty business.

    And Chelsea are just bastards.

  • Clarry
    Posted April 30, 2008 at 3:16 pm | Permalink

    Watch what you say about the mighty reds mister….

  • Posted April 30, 2008 at 3:19 pm | Permalink

    The reds? Their fans you mean?

    They’re a sentimental bunch of moustachioed fools who can’t speak the Queen’s English properly, la.

    I don’t think that stereotype has gone out of date.

  • Clarry
    Posted April 30, 2008 at 3:20 pm | Permalink

    NC – I’m not pretending to like football. I like all sorts me.

  • Posted April 30, 2008 at 3:20 pm | Permalink

    “Watch what you say about the mighty reds mister….”

    Why? Will your shares in Liverpool go down if they lose? Or do you own the team, outright? Maybe you play for them? Why so defensive? I doubt they’d rush to your defence if you were being insulted. Spurs have never jumped to mine, so insult the ungrateful buggers all you want.

  • Clarry
    Posted April 30, 2008 at 3:25 pm | Permalink

    Oh dear, sorry I spoke boys. I’ll keep a lid on it in future.

  • Posted April 30, 2008 at 3:27 pm | Permalink

    Haven’t watched a full ep of Enders (or telly for that matter) in a while thanks to my New Single Life(TM) but caught a snippet on Monday. It’s dire isn’t it? I agree that they’re misusing the Sean actor terribly. And Gus can’t act for shit, so why he’s suddenly all over Enders is beyond me. I don’t care about Calire/Bradders/Stacey any more or Stephen and his gayness. I don’t actually really care about any of them…

    Blimey…

    *heart breaks*

  • Posted April 30, 2008 at 3:32 pm | Permalink

    I’d care slightly more if they did something with the decent characters they’ve got. The Phil/Jack feud could have gone somewhere, yet didn’t, and I’m sure they could have done something with Ricky ‘n’ Bianca instead of just immediately turning them into background characters. And Shirley’s tits could have fallen off too.

    Welcome back, Badger, by the way.

  • Posted April 30, 2008 at 3:33 pm | Permalink

    Not that Ricky ‘n’ Bianca are decent characters, mind.

  • Posted April 30, 2008 at 3:48 pm | Permalink

    They should be using that Darren character more. He’s got some substance and isn’t just a background Mickey.

  • Posted April 30, 2008 at 3:50 pm | Permalink

    I’d agree with that one. There aren’t enough wheeler-dealer types. I’m not sure Bobby Davro’s going to fill the role too well. Surely the Alfie Moon bloke is now bankrupt enough to go back in?

  • Posted April 30, 2008 at 3:50 pm | Permalink

    Why thank you! I’ve been hovvering… Poised to comment when the time was right.

    Yes gawd, I’d pushed Bianca to the back of my mind. Her and her tribe of festering chav fools. *shudders* Still *wicked glint* at least Hollyoaks is still good.
    *awaits outrage from NC*

  • Posted April 30, 2008 at 3:51 pm | Permalink

    You’ll get no outrage from me, Badger. I am a changed man.

    I don’t watch Hollyoaks, but I’m sure it has its moments.

  • Posted April 30, 2008 at 4:04 pm | Permalink

    Compared to Enders it’s drama a-plenty. Plus you know. There’s lots of cleavage in it and that.

  • Posted April 30, 2008 at 4:07 pm | Permalink

    That’s never a bad thing.

    *furiously whips back with thorn branch*

  • Posted April 30, 2008 at 4:13 pm | Permalink

    As a white, working-class male, I was always under the impression Eastenders wasn’t really geared towards me. Though this Phil/Pool-cue thing you speak of could tempt me.

    What Eastenders needs – absolutely – is an alien character who only Peggy can see. Think of the hilarity!

  • Posted April 30, 2008 at 4:15 pm | Permalink

    I note you know who Peggy is. Not your thing, eh? CONFESS! CONFESS!

  • John Q Wagonwheel
    Posted April 30, 2008 at 10:14 pm | Permalink

    What’s this V+ nonsense then eh? At home we’ve just got a freeview box with double receivers so you can record to the 160gb hard drive inside as you watch something else. Or record on both and watch terrestrial.

  • Posted April 30, 2008 at 10:32 pm | Permalink

    V+ allows you to watch one digital channel, whilst recording a further two. You can also pause and rewind live TV. I’m not sure, but I think Sky does something similar.

  • John Q Wagonwheel
    Posted April 30, 2008 at 11:00 pm | Permalink

    Sounds a bit space-age for me.

    *replaces valve on the wireless*

  • Posted May 1, 2008 at 9:12 am | Permalink

    It IS space-age. It’s from the future.

    Where’s the Apprentice review? Eh?

  • Posted May 1, 2008 at 9:27 am | Permalink

    Peggy is a national treasure! (Defined by the Collins Dictionary as ‘annoying old caant who the BBC inflict on us and don’t have the balls to sack. See Also Forsyth, Bruce.’)

  • Posted May 1, 2008 at 9:31 am | Permalink

    So you do watch it, then?

    Where’s The Apprentice? Where is it?

Post a Comment

Your email is never shared. Required fields are marked *

*
*