NewsGush: EastEnders Spin Off E20 – Details Announced

E20, EastEnders, TV, Television, BBC, Soap Opera, Spin Off

It was news to me, but apparently the rumour was confirmed a while ago. EastEnders is to have its very own spin off – called E20 – hosted only on the web. The plan is for the 13 part show to last until January before three of the four characters join the soap proper. Not sure what’s happening to the other one.

DigitalSpy report on the major characters in this forthcoming drama blockbuster here, and the show will revolve around the lives of Mercy, Fatboy, Leon and Zsa Zsa as they attempt to squat in an abandoned flat in the Square – so they’ll presumably bump into the more recognisable locals occasionally.

It’s about time EastEnders had its own spin-off, but I’m not sure this is the right one. Personally, I was hoping for something more along the lines of Pat’s Pets, where the old timer played by Pam St. Clement inherits a functioning domestic animal retail outlet and gets into all kinds of scrapes trying to run it, having poached Patrick from the MiniMart to help her flog her wares.

Or how about Give Us a Butchers! in which Janine and Ricky fight for the custody of the triplets – Butch, Betty and Barney – they never knew their father Frank had sired just before Mike Reid popped his clogs.

Or how about new sitcom I’m Your Man – a late night, saucy giggle-fest in which new mother Heather auditions a number of potential lovers and possible Father Figures for her little lad, George Michael?

Blog Widget by LinkWithin

Post to Twitter Tweet This!

64 Comments

  • Posted November 25, 2009 at 9:32 am | Permalink

    I enjoyed that Frank Butcher spin-off where he was running a hotel at the seaside. It was shit, like, but nice to see Frank doing what he did best all the same.

  • Posted November 25, 2009 at 9:35 am | Permalink

    Da Doo Ron Ron

    Samantha Janus features as Ronnie Mitchell in this bitter-sweet tale of a condom-piercing, empty-nest psychopath.

  • Posted November 25, 2009 at 9:36 am | Permalink

    Underneath the Arches
    All the dead cast members come back as zombies feasting on the flesh of anyone with a B in their surname.

  • Posted November 25, 2009 at 9:41 am | Permalink

    Chill Winston!

    Market-stall holder Winston slowly becomes infuriated through each 22 minute episode of this candid-camera alike show, as fellow cast members disguised with beards put him through his paces and test his patience.

  • Posted November 25, 2009 at 9:42 am | Permalink

    Morning Nappers, Flotsky.

  • Fiona Mayhem
    Posted November 25, 2009 at 9:46 am | Permalink

    Uable to Join in
    because I haven’t watched Easties since the heyday of Ethel and Little Willie.
     
    Good Morning

  • Posted November 25, 2009 at 9:49 am | Permalink

    The Beale Deal
     
    Ian Beale is airlifted in as the surprise new boss of an ailing chain store, tasked with “lighting a fire under the business”.

  • Posted November 25, 2009 at 9:50 am | Permalink

    But that’s all from me – because if the week acquires another Friday, I’ll be in serious trouble.

  • Posted November 25, 2009 at 9:52 am | Permalink

    Sorry – I didn’t mean to start a pitching frenzy. Are we all well?

  • Fiona Mayhem
    Posted November 25, 2009 at 9:54 am | Permalink

    Also, can anybody tell me if this is supposed to rival the late night Hollyoaks ones?

  • Posted November 25, 2009 at 9:59 am | Permalink

    It’s just some online marketing, Mel… I don’t think it’s even built to last.

  • Fiona Mayhem
    Posted November 25, 2009 at 10:01 am | Permalink

    Oh yes, I didn’t read the line ”hosted only on the web’
    Must Try Harder, sorry Swines.

  • Posted November 25, 2009 at 10:02 am | Permalink

    MORNING!

  • Posted November 25, 2009 at 10:03 am | Permalink

    Wasn’t the nightclub called E20 at one time as well? Back when I used to have to have this tripe on for most of Sunday when I lived with two girls. Tsk.

  • Posted November 25, 2009 at 10:03 am | Permalink

    Second time you’ve apologised to me this week, Mel – and neither was necessary.

    *bows*

    MORNINHSG

  • Posted November 25, 2009 at 10:04 am | Permalink

    It was indeed, Fourstar. It’s also been called Angie’s Den and is currently known as R&R.

  • Posted November 25, 2009 at 10:07 am | Permalink

    Harry Hill’s Knitted Character’s in the background of The Wright Stuff.

  • Fiona Mayhem
    Posted November 25, 2009 at 10:09 am | Permalink

    Knitted Charater’s what Nappers?
    *runs away*

  • Posted November 25, 2009 at 10:10 am | Permalink

    Idiot.

  • Posted November 25, 2009 at 10:12 am | Permalink

    Nappers – I’m doing a NewsGush on that little character as we speak… something weird is happening.

  • Posted November 25, 2009 at 10:29 am | Permalink

    Eastenders spinoffs would make a good FQ. Mustn’t start to think of any, and definitely shouldn’t tell the wife.
     
    Phil ‘er up
     
    New series. Sexy adventures as Phil Mitchell leaves the pub game to run a petrol station that is situated next door to a branch of Ann Summers.
     
    Damn!

  • Fiona Mayhem
    Posted November 25, 2009 at 10:29 am | Permalink

    Actually, going back to the article, I  have some  questions:
    Is this web released stuff going to become a way to test new characters in a long-runing soap, in much the same way that a pilot would do for a new programme? In which case, will only the popular ones get in? Does that make it a bit like a cheap talent show, along the lines of How Do You Solve A Problem Like Maria, for characters?
    Or is this a way to test the popularity of releasing all kinds of programmes onto the internet?
    Either way, it sounds a bit like one of those choose your own adventure books, off of the 80s, but for Directors.

  • Posted November 25, 2009 at 10:34 am | Permalink

    I love Phil ‘er Up – maybe should involve dogging though.

    Mel – I think it’s purely marketing really, trying to create a buzz. No doubt the trailers will be Bebo embeddable and all over mystonedeadspace.

    But you could be right. At least this way we wouldn’t ever have been subject to that Ferrari family they shoehorned in to the Square years ago.

  • Posted November 25, 2009 at 10:35 am | Permalink

    It sounds like a lot of bluesky thinking with regards to new media and how it can enable the mainstream delivery of the product to the audience.

    Why not have a radio spin off eh…eh? It would just be a lot of screaming.

  • Posted November 25, 2009 at 10:38 am | Permalink

    Frank Butcher hosts a childrens programme where the little sods have to choose the correct answer to a question by leaping to the correct spot in the studio. Call it….Leap Around or something…
     
    Good morning one and all.
    I’m still alive, good eh?

  • Posted November 25, 2009 at 10:38 am | Permalink

    Mercy, Fatboy, Leon and Zsa Zsa sound like characters from Battle Of The Planets.

  • Posted November 25, 2009 at 10:38 am | Permalink

    Or a graphic novel spinoff..or a weekly comic for themes not explored on the TV!

  • Fiona Mayhem
    Posted November 25, 2009 at 10:39 am | Permalink

    DINLT – I would definitely tune in to Eastenders on the radio. If for nothing else than the fight scenes, which would be hilarious
    *remembers comedy fight between Kenton and conman/ theif that was sponsored for GA by Alistair*

  • Fiona Mayhem
    Posted November 25, 2009 at 10:39 am | Permalink

    Why might you have been dead Nick?

  • Posted November 25, 2009 at 10:39 am | Permalink

    Runaround Nick..you buffoon..is your radio show up on one of your websites yet?

  • Posted November 25, 2009 at 10:45 am | Permalink

    No, tonight DINLT. I’ll have to put it on my blog as Mrs Nick is on a business trip, or so she says….
    I fell asleep on the way home last night Mel. Unfortunately, I was driving on the M3 at the time. Woke up, slammed on brakes, big skid, adrenaline rush like you wouldn’t believe but no harm done. Haven’t done that since I was a 20 year old …
     
    Spooning eh?

  • Fiona Mayhem
    Posted November 25, 2009 at 10:46 am | Permalink

    Jesus, Nick. You want to watch out for that.
     
    Glad you are ok then.

  • Posted November 25, 2009 at 10:47 am | Permalink

    Good Morning. I thought Mercy, Fatboy, Leon and Zsa Zsa were the names of the atomic bombs dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki?

  • Posted November 25, 2009 at 10:50 am | Permalink

    Mad Max Branning
     
    In a post-apocalyptic Walford, one hero emerges to lead the scarred mutants to a new home. Preyed upon by biker gangs, tortured by their own radiation-induced deformities, they look to one man for leadership…Mad Max Branning.
     
    OK, I’m done now, I promise.

  • Posted November 25, 2009 at 10:50 am | Permalink

    Christ nick, that sounds like it was a close one, glad you are ok.

  • Posted November 25, 2009 at 10:52 am | Permalink

    Jesus, Nick – you need to be more careful. If you die at the wheel we’ll be missing the essential musical component of the WWM podcast. Do you want the fans to go hungry??

  • Posted November 25, 2009 at 10:54 am | Permalink

    Am I the only one finding it hard to reconcile the idea of a web series with Eastenders? It’s not exactly a show that has embraced all the trappings of modern technology. I think I could count on the fingers of one hand the number of characters that have been seen using a computer.
     
    Speaking of technology, what happened to the BBC last night? They go to all the trouble of making fake bottles of beer, rum etc (because they don’t want to advertise) and then Ben comes down the stairs carrying a mobile phone with a very noticeable LG logo on it!

  • Posted November 25, 2009 at 10:55 am | Permalink

    I feel like I’ve been given a second chance.
    Drinks lunchtime to celebrate, I’ll drive….
     

  • Posted November 25, 2009 at 10:56 am | Permalink

    Sorry, mobile phone *box*, not the mobile itself.

  • Posted November 25, 2009 at 10:59 am | Permalink

    I’ll second that, Nick. It’d be nice if you could refrain from breaking your neck while we work on these songs.

    Your behaviour’s bordering on selfish, quite frankly.

  • Posted November 25, 2009 at 11:01 am | Permalink

    Anyone watch Paradox? If you didn’t, lucky, lucky you.

  • Posted November 25, 2009 at 11:03 am | Permalink

    Last time I did that was driving back from a David Bowie concert in Milton Keynes Bowl 1984, so every 26 years…

  • Posted November 25, 2009 at 11:05 am | Permalink

    The review in this morning’s otherwise dreadful METRO was ace:
     
    Paradox would love to be FlashForward but  it’s really The Bill set in a branch of PC World.”

  • Fiona Mayhem
    Posted November 25, 2009 at 11:06 am | Permalink

    Is that the one with Tamsin Outhwaite in NC?
    In which case, no, even the trailers looked shit.

  • Posted November 25, 2009 at 11:08 am | Permalink

    Superb, Fourstar.

    It contained the most intense Scotch performances I’ve seen since the lead shouting regional policeman in Holby Blue. Hopefully next week the two Scotch leads will have an intense Scotch-off. The one who comes off as less intensely Scotch will either burst into flames or turn into a Welshman.

  • Posted November 25, 2009 at 11:09 am | Permalink

    On a separate subject, Potsie from Happy Days used to make my flesh creep.

  • Fiona Mayhem
    Posted November 25, 2009 at 11:13 am | Permalink

    Why’s that Nappers?
    II had to google him, but he looks fairly innocuous

  • Posted November 25, 2009 at 11:14 am | Permalink

    Ralph Malph (?) was the worst of the Happy Days offenders. Definitely a sex pest.

  • Posted November 25, 2009 at 11:16 am | Permalink

    Happy Days lost it when the audience would cheer when a character would make their first appearance in the episode.

  • Posted November 25, 2009 at 11:17 am | Permalink

    Agreed on the Malph….errrrrr

  • Posted November 25, 2009 at 11:17 am | Permalink

    Once Arnold left…it was the beginning of the slide.

  • Posted November 25, 2009 at 11:19 am | Permalink

    Happy Days lost it when it jumped the shark – FACT.

  • Posted November 25, 2009 at 11:21 am | Permalink

    CONCLUSIVE PROOF

  • Posted November 25, 2009 at 11:25 am | Permalink

    Ralph wasn’t half as bad as Potsie. Potsie always struck me as the sort of character who would a.) steal your missus and b.) swindle you out of your savings.

    He always came across like butter wouldn’t melt, but underneath you could tell he was a bit of a slippery customer.

  • Posted November 25, 2009 at 11:28 am | Permalink

    They had a band didn’t they? They would always perform Splish Splash….

    Also the potential date and “making out” with Laura Beth would signal a chorus “I’ve found my thrill….”

  • Posted November 25, 2009 at 11:33 am | Permalink

    “Joni loves  Chachi” don’t make em like that anymore, thank christ

  • Posted November 25, 2009 at 11:38 am | Permalink

    Laverne and Shirl was a spinoff weren’t it?
    ***googles

  • Posted November 25, 2009 at 11:41 am | Permalink

    They were but I never remembered them from Happy Days

  • Posted November 25, 2009 at 11:46 am | Permalink

    Potsie was alright, but that Mr Cunningham was a bad ‘un. Behind closed doors, he was a holy terror. It’s established fact* that they based Trevor on Eastenders off him. They even filmed the episode of Happy Days where Mrs C lamped him with the steam iron, but it never got aired.
     
    *By which I mean, of course, not established fact at all, but just conjecture on my part.

  • Posted November 25, 2009 at 11:48 am | Permalink

    Laverne & Shirley was a spinoff, as was Mork & Mindy. That said, Happy Days itself was a spinoff.

  • Posted November 25, 2009 at 11:54 am | Permalink

    Mr Cunningham went on to appear in Charlies Angels…

  • Posted November 25, 2009 at 12:05 pm | Permalink

    Someone went to all the trouble of working out that if the final episode of “St. Elsewhere” revealed the show to be the imagination of an autistic child, then all other shows connected to it must also be that same child’s imagination. Turned into quite a complicated list, when they got to the end of it.

  • Posted November 25, 2009 at 4:56 pm | Permalink

    FawnDoo, I would look at that list, but I value my sanity – or ’sania’, to quote latterday philsopher Petre Andreus

  • Posted November 25, 2009 at 9:45 pm | Permalink

    I think that the big diagram is pretty impressive, but I agree that the list (and some of the convoluted reasoning behind it) could possibly cause a headache if looked at too long. Never much liked Andreus, more of a Socratie Price fan myself.

Post a Comment

Your email is never shared. Required fields are marked *

*
*